Overseer of the Treasury, Ptahhotep
Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art
On View: 19th Dynasty to Roman Period, Martha A. and Robert S. Rubin Gallery, 3rd Floor
Ptahhotep is shown in a Persian costume that Egyptian officials adopted under the Persian rulers to imitate Persian court attire. The jacket with flaring sleeves, over which a skirt is wrapped, is complemented by a Persian bracelet and torque (a bar-like necklace) as well as by an Egyptian pectoral, or chest plaque. These accessories give Ptahhotep the overall appearance of an Egypto-Persian official, one whose dress speaks clearly of his loyalty to the Persian king. The rendering of the two ibexes that terminate the torque, however, is typically Egyptian, with the heads shown from the side. This treatment, together with the pectoral showing Ptah and the lion-headed goddess Sakhmet, underscores the essentially Egyptian nature of the statue.
MEDIUM
Quartzite
DATES
521–486 B.C.E.
DYNASTY
early Dynasty 27
PERIOD
First Persian Period
DIMENSIONS
35 × 12 × 13 in., 252 lb. (88.9 × 30.5 × 33 cm, 114.31kg)
mount (dimensions as installed): 36 × 12 × 13 in. (91.4 × 30.5 × 33 cm)
(show scale)
ACCESSION NUMBER
37.353
CREDIT LINE
Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund
PROVENANCE
Archaeological provenance not yet documented, probably from the Temple of Ptah-Tenen, Memphis, Egypt; by 1937, acquired by Gregorie Loukianoff of Cairo, Egypt; 1937, purchased from Gregorie Loukianoff by Jean Capart for the Brooklyn Museum.
Provenance FAQ
CATALOGUE DESCRIPTION
Fragmentary, standing statue in dark grey stone of the overseer of all royal works, the chief of the treasury Ptah-hotep. Originally naophoros with naos supported by long, slender pedestal. Body clad in two garments, a shirt and long skirt. Persian torque around neck. Rear pillar inscribed with four columns of inscriptions.
Condition: Poor. Head, base, feet hands naos lost. There are numerous scattered chips. Part of inscription missing. Left side of sculpture badly broken.
CAPTION
Overseer of the Treasury, Ptahhotep, 521–486 B.C.E. Quartzite, 35 × 12 × 13 in., 252 lb. (88.9 × 30.5 × 33 cm, 114.31kg). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.353. Creative Commons-BY (Photo: , 37.353_PS9.jpg)
IMAGE
overall, 37.353_PS9.jpg., 2018
"CUR" at the beginning of an image file name means that the image was created by a curatorial staff member. These study images may be digital point-and-shoot photographs, when we don\'t yet have high-quality studio photography, or they may be scans of older negatives, slides, or photographic prints, providing historical documentation of the object.
RIGHTS STATEMENT
Creative Commons-BY
You may download and use Brooklyn Museum images of this three-dimensional work in accordance with a
Creative Commons license. Fair use, as understood under the United States Copyright Act, may also apply.
Please include caption information from this page and credit the Brooklyn Museum. If you need a high resolution file, please fill out our online
application form (charges apply).
For further information about copyright, we recommend resources at the
United States Library of Congress,
Cornell University,
Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums, and
Copyright Watch.
For more information about the Museum's rights project, including how rights types are assigned, please see our
blog posts on copyright.
If you have any information regarding this work and rights to it, please contact
copyright@brooklynmuseum.org.
RECORD COMPLETENESS
Not every record you will find here is complete. More information is available for some works than for others, and some entries have been updated more recently. Records are frequently reviewed and revised, and
we welcome any additional information you might have.
What happened to the rest of this?
It's quite simply very old! This sculpture of a man named Ptahhotep is over 2500 years old and it got a little beaten up since then. We don't know where the broken off pieces are.
Did they melt the sandstone to make the statute and chisel it?
In ancient sculpture, the stone would not be melted. Rough shaping would be done with chisels, but the fine curves and polished surface that you see here would have been achieved with abrasives much like we use sandpaper today.
Thanks