Mrs.Thomas Mumford VI

William Johnston

Brooklyn Museum photograph

Object Label

George Inness's view of the Delaware Rive (near the Kittatinny Ridge of the Appalachian Mountains) includes details like river rafts and a puffing train engine that represent human industry within a natural setting filled with color and light. Inness, a believer in the antislavery cause along with his close friend Henry Ward Beecher, used his most important Civil War-period paintings to convey an optimistic vision in which clearing skies and flourishing landscapes suggested the promise of peace and national prosperity.

Caption

William Johnston American, 1732–1772. Mrs.Thomas Mumford VI, 1763. Oil on canvas, 49 15/16 x 38 13/16 in. (126.9 x 98.6 cm) frame: 56 1/2 × 45 3/8 × 2 1/2 in. (143.5 × 115.3 × 6.4 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Dick S. Ramsay Fund, 80.80. No known copyright restrictions (Photo: Brooklyn Museum, 80.80.jpg)

Gallery

Not on view

Collection

American Art

Title

Mrs.Thomas Mumford VI

Date

1763

Medium

Oil on canvas

Classification

Painting

Dimensions

49 15/16 x 38 13/16 in. (126.9 x 98.6 cm) frame: 56 1/2 × 45 3/8 × 2 1/2 in. (143.5 × 115.3 × 6.4 cm)

Credit Line

Dick S. Ramsay Fund

Accession Number

80.80

Rights

No known copyright restrictions

This work may be in the public domain in the United States. Works created by United States and non-United States nationals published prior to 1923 are in the public domain, subject to the terms of any applicable treaty or agreement. You may download and use Brooklyn Museum images of this work. Please include caption information from this page and credit the Brooklyn Museum. If you need a high resolution file, please fill out our online application form (charges apply). The Museum does not warrant that the use of this work will not infringe on the rights of third parties, such as artists or artists' heirs holding the rights to the work. It is your responsibility to determine and satisfy copyright or other use restrictions before copying, transmitting, or making other use of protected items beyond that allowed by "fair use," as such term is understood under the United States Copyright Act. The Brooklyn Museum makes no representations or warranties with respect to the application or terms of any international agreement governing copyright protection in the United States for works created by foreign nationals. For further information about copyright, we recommend resources at the United States Library of Congress, Cornell University, Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums, and Copyright Watch. For more information about the Museum's rights project, including how rights types are assigned, please see our blog posts on copyright. If you have any information regarding this work and rights to it, please contact copyright@brooklynmuseum.org.

Frequent Art Questions

  • Could you comment on the style of this painting and the status of the subject?

    This is a typical portrait painted in colonial era North America. The style is clearly inspired by British trends at the time, but the execution suggests that the artist was self-taught. There weren't art schools in the North American colonies in the 18th century. Since there were few artists working in the British colonies, having a portrait painted was a special occasion. What do you think that says about the status of Mrs. Mumford?
    I work in a historic mansion in which we have a copy of a John Wollaston painting of Martha Washington's children from her first marriage to Daniel Parke Custis. The painting is in a very similar style for the same reasons. So I am sure she held elevated status.
  • Can you tell me more about the clothing depicted here?

    Her gown, with its lace decoration, and the pearls she's wearing, are both markers of wealth and status from the time. Whether she actually owned these objects, or was shown wearing them to portray a specific type of image to those who visited her home, is uncertain.
  • The description said that this was potentially "image enhanced." How?

    At the time this painting was made, it was common for artists to paint portraits based, at least in part, on prints and reproductions of other paintings. The dress in particular is similar to the clothing in another portrait by the same painter, suggesting that he might have copied the dress for this portrait, rather than painting what the sitter was actually wearing! When we say "image enhanced" we mean that the image is possibly a composite from multiple references, rather than completely true to life.
  • Did the artist intend to make the subject appear more masculine?

    No, they didn't. In fact, the painter was likely self taught, with the help of observation of other painting and print reproductions. That could explain why his style appears slightly unusual to you!

Have information?

Have information about an artwork? Contact us at

bkmcollections@brooklynmuseum.org.